What are the zodiac signs doing on the bus home?

4 Comments

1. Capricorn says:

   March 22, 2010 at 1:30 am

   Aries- He is disappointed to go home. He was having so much fun outside flirting.

   Taurus- He is disappointed and grumpy, but the reason is quite different. He left home to punish the lover with whom he was having an imaginary argument. Bus driver actually had to tie him to the seat with a rope in order to take him home.

   Gemini- He is talking to his other half on his mind and laughing about the psycho taurus.

   Cancer- Duty calls! He is driving the bus and at the same time praying so taurus stops being moody towards his lover, virgo stops criticizing, aries doesnt end up with aids and leo stops singing….AND also so that the bus doesnt end up going to heaven!

   Leo- He is playing guiter at the back of the bus about the scenes passing by.

   Virgo- He was quite for a long time and little annoyed because he thought roads were too dirty and thats why carpets should be placed on them, but now suddenly its time to get critical about something else…and that is leo’s song. the virgo suddenly stands up to criticize it. but no one is in mood to really listen to him and so he goes up to the tied taurus and tells him how leo should clean up his throat with clorex bleach and sing the song in right way.

   Libra- He is sitting all very depressed. There are 14 family members living in his house , but he feels he has no one because no one has yet praised him for his new $1000 t-shirt.

   Scorpio- He is busy checking some stuff in his bag…and the thing he has in his bag is the information about what taurus was doing outside. he is supposed to give this to taurus’ lover. and then he has some dna report about leo which he will use to investigate whether singing is actually in leo’s blood.

   Sagg- He is having an asthma…and this attack is the cause of the fact that he is going home where he feels he wont have oxygen for his survival.

   Capricorn- The bus is jerking on the broken road, but capricorn is not giving up working on the financial statement he is taking home.

   Aquarius- He is writing down on a piece of paper the estimates of the budget he will have for friday party.

   Pisces- He is sleeping and dreaming about fairies and elves. Unfortunately, he still doesnt know that he is on the bus.
2. fran naire says:

   March 26, 2010 at 2:33 am

   I know. Let’s take it home, people.
3. daro porto says:

   March 31, 2010 at 6:57 am

   A lot of people don't think about this but astrology is really a form of bigotry. No one controls what sex, race, or nationality they are born as. If you judge people by race or sex, that is call racism and sexism. Both of these are not tolerated in our society. Neither do we control when we are born. Judging and stereotyping people with no evidence of truth is called astrology.

   Why do we accept prejudice by calling it Astrology?

   Edit: How about testing?

   Think of this. An expert astrologer draws up your detailed chart based on your accurate natal data. You are given this horoscope, and two others of different people. Would you be able to tell which one is yours? Because if not, what does it mean to say that astrology works? Whenever this test is done, people are not able to do this with any greater probability than pure chance. (i.e. one in three would get it right.)

   Possibly the most detailed test of astrology using this type of method, was performed by Shawn Carlson. His paper, “A Double-blind Test of Astrology”, was published in the peer reviewed scientific journal Nature, in 1985. The interesting thing is that the San Francisco chapter of the National Council for Geocosmic Research recommended the 28 professional astrologers who took part, and (with Carlson), designed the tests. They also predicted, in advance, what they would consider to be a successful test.

   Two tests were performed:

   Test #1: Astrological charts were prepared for 83 subjects, based on natal data (date, time and place of birth), provided by the subjects. Each subject was given three charts: one chart based on their own natal data, and two charts derived from natal data of other people. Each subject was asked to identify the chart that most correctly described them. In only 28 of the 83 cases, the subject chose their own chart. This is the exact success rate expected for random chance. The astrologers predicted that the subjects would select their own chart more that 50% of the time.

   Test #2: 116 subjects completed California Personality Index surveys and provided natal data (date, time and place of birth). One set of natal data and the results of three personality surveys (one of which was for the same person as the natal data) were given to an astrologer who was to interpret the natal data and determine which of the three CPI results belonged to the same subject as the natal data. In only 40 of the 116 cases, the astrologers chose the correct CPI. As with test #1, this is the exact success rate expected for random chance. The astrologers predicted that they would select the correct CPI profiles in more that 50 per cent of the trials.

   Conclusion by Carlson:
   "We are now in a position to argue a surprisingly strong case against natal astrology as practiced by reputable astrologers. Great pains were taken to insure that the experiment was unbiased and to make sure that astrology was given every reasonable chance to succeed. It failed. Despite the fact that we worked with some of the best astrologers in the country, recommended by the advising astrologers for their expertise in astrology and in their ability to use the CPI, despite the fact that every reasonable suggestion made by advising astrologers was worked into the experiment, despite the fact that the astrologers approved the design and predicted 50% as the "minimum" effect they would expect to see, astrology failed to perform at a level better than chance.

   "I have not yet received a serious scientific challenge to the paper. The newsletter of the American Federation of Astrologers Network published a response in January (1986). I was very disappointed to see that it largely consists of personal attacks. Its few substantive criticisms are attributable to ignorance of the experiment, of the CPI, and of basic scientific methodology."
4. osaka godder says:

   April 2, 2010 at 5:21 am

   Capricorn Zodiac Pendants Fashion Jewelry Necklaces
   Pugster
   (1)
   Buy new: $34.08 $17.04
   (Ranking is updated hourly. Visit the Hot New Releases in Necklaces & Pendants list for authoritative information on this product’s current rank.)